They evaluated these companies from their very beginning to present-day and analyzed their different stages along the way as first start-ups, then as midsize companies, and now as large companies. It was in response to these questions that BHAGs were born.
BHAGs have been used by a number of successful companies throughout history. Goal setting is a general theory that can be applied in a multitude of work situations. The strongest support relates to the relationship between specific, difficult goals and task performance.
A meta-analysis performed by Tubbs supported the concept that specific, difficult goals are positively correlated to improved performance. DeWalt, et al. Parker, Jimmieson, and Amiot found that autonomy in the workplace improves self-efficacy, which improves performance towards reaching goals. Within this idea is the vision and structure that goal setting provides, which helps to motivate individuals and teams to perform better and do more Sorrentino, Goal setting is not without its critics.
Care should be taken in applying goal setting due to the possible unintended side effects. The arguments levied against the theory are not new and have been discussed by previous researchers.
In an effort to reach a sales quota, salespeople may either fudge numbers or lie to customers. The preponderance of empirical research supporting goal-setting theory illustrates its utility as a method to motivate individuals and improve organizational outcomes.
While some caution may be in order, Locke and Latham argue that failures resulting from the theory are usually due to errors in its application and can often be prevented. The subject of human motivation is vast and complex. No single theory fully explains every aspect of what motivates individuals to perform better. Management of the timber industry in Oklahoma noticed that employees were not loading trucks to full capacity, which resulted in additional trips and greater associated costs e.
Subsequently, this particular study focused on the productivity of lumber crews who transported timber from forests to sawmills in Oklahoma with the implementation of a goals program PSU WC, , L.
Latham and Baldes hypothesized that setting goals would result in increased performance; they predicted that these benefits would be present after one month PSU WC, , L. With each trip, drivers weighed their trucks with a loading scale indicating how heavy their loads were.
Ludwig and Geller conducted another study that depicts the benefits of goal setting theory; this time with pizza delivery drivers PSU WC, , L. In this particular study, Ludwig and Geller addressed safety concerns, resulting from high accident rates of pizza deliverers. Ludwig and Geller observed approximately deliverers, from three different restaurants, as they delivered pizza to establish a baseline measure that revealed they failed to come to complete stops less than half of the time PSU WC, , L.
Ludwig and Geller then assigned drivers to three participant groups: a control group, a participative goal group, and an assigned goal group. Drivers were given feedback on their stop rate and compared against the goal; the control group was not given a goal. This particular study suggests that feedback is crucial to maintaining performance towards goals and that participative and assigned goals generally elicit the same short-term response PSU WC, , L.
A study conducted in by researchers Eran Vigoda-Gadot and Larisa Angert at the University of Haifa found connections between the aspects of goal-setting theory, specifically in the realm of feedback and Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB.
Participants in this study were students working in a social service capacity with needy children in Israel. Since the researchers were already in agreement about Locke and Latham's argument that the setting of specific goals was better than vague ones, their focus was on how behaviors unrelated to goals would be increased by the processes of goal setting.
The findings concluded that though the process is important, the key remained in feedback regarding both the formal goals set during the process as well as feedback regarding other informal behaviors. This is important since it is not only results that drive an organization, but the people who fit within it and how they conduct themselves.
According to Locke and Latham using techniques such as correlational, experimental and quasi-experimental design, a plethora of research studies have been conducted over 40 years using close to 40, participants in eight countries, over time periods varying from one minute to 25 years PSU WC, , L.
Smith and Hitt in their book, Great Minds in Management, reinforced the popularity of this theory with their reference to a assessment of organizational behavior scholars who rated goal-setting theory first in importance out of seventy-three management theories, validating the claim that goal setting has had tremendous research and practitioner support PSU WC, , L.
Its applications within organizations are extensive, so much so that "79 percent of British organizations use some form of goal setting" PSU WC, , L. The success of goal-setting has even lead to the development of even more specific procedures and applications of goal setting, such as Management by Objectives. MBO has shown, through both field experiments and meta-analyses to be astoundingly effective: "97 percent of the 23 studies reviewed found increases in productivity" PSU WC, , L.
This means that, just as an individual would succeed with his or her goals using these theories, organizations, despite their industry or size, should have just as much success when properly applying the mechanisms and conditions.
Ludwig and Geller found success with pizza delivery drivers, and Latham and Baldes found success with lumber crews. The implications stretch as far as to say, if there is a goal, there is motivation to reach it. According to Latham goal setting has been found to inspire individuals and is a critical key to self-management.
In many cases, goal setting creates an alternative purpose for work and provides the challenge that enables individuals to overcome even the most physically exhausting tasks Latham, W hether a goal requires cognitive or physical exertion, perhaps even both, studies have shown that the greatest amount of effort is applied to those that are considered more challenging Latham, From a psychological standpoint, a sense of pride develops from an individual's improved self-interest; which may lead to better jobs and increased pay over time Latham, When making the commitment to set a goal and focus on its accomplishment within a specified period of time, attention is often diverted away from activities that are considered goal-irrelevant.
For this reason, people are often motivated to utilize or discover the knowledge necessary for successful completion Latham, When two separate goals are set at the same time, exerting too much focus on one may make it difficult to achieve the other Latham, For example, if someone sets quantity and quality goals simultaneously; trying too hard for quantity may cause quality to be neglected Latham, However, this can be fixed by prioritizing separate goals or finding a balance between goals directly dealing with each other.
Another limitation deals with goals and risks. During a computer game study, Knight, Durham, and Locke found that participants who were given difficult performance goals increased risk strategies to improve performance. Additionally, a limitation that can occur is commonly referred to as tunnel vision. This is when employees focus so intently on their goals that they will ignore other aspects of their job PSU WC, , L.
When attention is focused too narrowly on a goal, inattentional bias can occur. This was demonstrated in a study Simons and Chabris. In the study, subjects were asked to measure the number of passes in a basketball game. People became so focused on their task that they didn't notice a man in a gorilla suit on the course. In a case study done with GE goal setting seemed to backfire on the company.
Goals, they feared, might actually be taking the place of independent thinking and personal initiative" Bennett, , para. If people are always having goals set for them it is difficult for them to motivate themselves. Improper management techniques, or the presence of inequity in the workplace e. Goal Setting Theory also does not account for actions motivated by the subconscious; as the goal-setting theory focuses on cognition with no regard to the subconscious PSU WC, , L.
On occasion, an individual can do something without being aware of what is motivating them. This cognitive quality of this theory makes it such that, much like other cognitive motivation theories, it takes for granted the fact that "people can take action without being aware of what is motivating them" PSU WC, , L. More tangible and challenging goals would be much more difficult to pursue subconsciously, largely due to the amount of planning and forethought required to accomplish them.
But subtler and more general goals could potentially be striven for and achieved subconsciously. Finally, goal-setting theory focuses on how goals are related to job performance, but does not take into account the "why" now how this is related to increased job performance PSU WC, , L. This lack of defined translation between goals and job performance calls for future research to refine PSU WC, , L.
Without a specific goal that addresses what one is trying to achieve and by how much i. This leads into the idea that these specific goals must be measurable in quantity. This allows for process feedback later on and without a measurable, quantitative component, it will be difficult to determine if one has moved toward their goal PSU WC, , L. The A refers to assignable ; when a goal is not assignable, no one individual is responsible for achieving the goal, thus no one is accountable and the goal may never be achieved.
Goals must be realistic in that they can be achieved within the expected period of achievement. When a goal is unrealistic, an individual will be less likely to work toward it since they know it won't be attainable. Many times it is helpful to setup small, goals along the way to the major achievement. This not only allows for more realistic expectations but provides small achievements along the way to increase motivation.
Without these, motivation may drop significantly. Lastly, a goal that is not time-related and lacks a definite end doesn't allow for feedback as there is no date to work toward. When this deadline isn't realistic, motivation goes down and performance may suffer. Overall, all of these components must be present for a goal to be completed. Whilst they all have a tendency to lead to inability to achieve the goal, the bigger problem may lie in where the work leads the individual, if not toward the final desired effect.
While research provides an abundance of support in favor of the effectiveness of goal-setting theory on achieving organizational goals or improving outcomes, a dangerous side of goals has also been identified.
With recent large-scale failures of organizations such as GM, Enron, Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac, skeptics find support in their belief, that setting goals can also lead to disastrous outcomes. By recounting the atmosphere at Enron, as hostile, dysfunctional and ultimately criminal, executives were rewarded for meeting revenue targets, which essentially created the atmosphere and it's consequential collapse, the negative outcomes of this theory are apparent.
In addition, Sears, Roebuck and Co. As utilization of this valuable theory of motivation continues in the workplace, the negative outcomes presented in these examples, can remind us of its potential dangers. A recent example of goal setting theory going awry is the current Wells Fargo scandal. This scandal showed the consequence of the upper management not foreseeing the dire effects of the corporate goal of 8 accounts per customer. The entire goal of the company was to increase their "cross sale" ratio.
This ratio became the standard by which the company based itself on. As this goal made it down the layers in the company, it became a benchmark for employee pay, bonuses, and reviews. Instead of rating an employee by their whole job, the cross sale ratio took on a life of its' own. The cross sale goal became the company's calling card with equity analysts and drove the stock price up. This made the executives millions of dollars and reinforced their belief in the cross sale ratio. It became something that was pushed even harder.
In order to make money and not lose their jobs, the front line employees resorted to creating millions of fake accounts with customer knowledge. Baker Goal setting is widely used in the workplace as a means to improve and sustain work performance.
Consequently, the expectation is that employee efforts and performance within an organization will be influenced by the goals assigned to or selected by these employees. Furthermore, goal setting can function as a contract between the employee and employer, creating greater opportunities for accountability and growth Oracle, Some of the ways managers use this theory are included in the graphic below:.
Some reward systems that are used for employees reaching their goals are:. MBO is an approach to systematically align both employees' goals and the goals of the organization and ensures that everyone is clear about what they are doing and why it is beneficial to the organization Mindtools, This provides a mechanism to ensure that the goals of the organization coincide with the goals of the individual s within that organization.
MBO focuses on a joint determination by subordinate and superior goals, major areas of responsibility, and result expectations. These are the measures used to determine employee contribution and operations of the organization. While there are notable key steps in MBO, the theory varies between organizations and from theorist to theorist. Some of these differences include: setting objectives, working towards goals, and reviewing performance.
He is a Fellow of the A merican specific production goal to assign their Psy chological Association and a member of the Academy of M anagement. He has published employees. In addition, each sawhand was more than 70 chapters and articles, primarily in given a tallymeter counter that he could the area of work motivation and job satisfaction. The sawhand was asked to punch the counter each time he felled a tree. They pointed out that the results simply The ten supervisors in the control reflected the positive effects any supervisor group-those who were not asked to set pro- would have on the work unit after giving his duction goals-were told that the re- crew attention.
And they were unimpressed searchers were interested in learning the ex- by the laboratory experiments we cited-ex- tent to which productivity is affected by periments showing that individuals who absenteeism and injuries.
It was explained that the data Skepticism prevailed. We were granted fect, we made an equal number of visits to permission to run one more project to test the control group and the training group. Performance was measured for 12 weeks.
Twenty independent logging crews During this time, the productivity of the who were all but identical in size, mech- goal-setting group was significantly higher anization level, terrain on which they than that of the control group.
If the groups that set goals than in the groups who trucks were overloaded, however, the driver were simply urged to do their best. Injury could be fined by the Highway Department and turnover rates were low in both groups. The Why should anything so simple drivers opted for underloading the trucks. But this approach did not prove cost monotonous, tiring job with little or no effective, because the scales continually meaning for most workers. Introducing a broke down when subjected to the rough ter- goal that is difficult, but attainable, increases rain on which the trucks traveled.
Conse- the challenge of the job. In addition, a quently, the drivers reverted to their former specific goal makes it clear to the worker practice of underloading. For the three what it is he is expected to do. Goal feedback months in which the problem was under via the tallymeter and weekly recordkeeping study the trucks were seldom loaded in ex- provide the worker with a sense of achieve- cess of 58 to 63 percent of capacity.
He At the end of the three-month can see how well he is doing now as against period, the results of the previous goal- his past performance and, in some cases, setting experiments were explained to the how well he is doing in comparison with union. They were told three things-that the others. Thus the worker not only may ex- company would like to set a specific net pend greater effort, but may also devise bet- weight goal for the drivers, that no ter or more creative tactics for attaining the monetary reward or fringe benefits other goal than those he previously used.
However, they nique for increasing the productivity of the reached an agreement that a difficult, but at- independent woods worker in the South. This West with company logging operations in latter point was emphasized to the company which the employees were unionized and foremen in particular. The previous study had in- Within the first month, perfor- volved employees on a piece-rate system, mance increased to 80 percent of the trucks which was the practice in the South.
After the second month, how- The immediate problem confront- ever, performance decreased to 70 percent. Fortunately for all concerned, no yard. In short, competition affected produc- such steps were taken by the foremen, and tivity only in the sense that it led to the ac- performance exceeded 90 percent of the ceptance of, and commitment to, the goal. How can we make it if goal setting had not been implemented. First, the drivers did not education, would work better with assigned feel that they were really doing anything dif- goals, while the educated workers in the ferently.
This, of course, was not true. As a West would achieve higher productivity if result of goal setting, the men began to they were allowed to help set the goals record their truck weight in a pocket themselves.
Why the focus on education? Second, they viewed goal setting as a vantaged. The cycle of skill Competition was a crucial factor in mastery, which in turn guarantees skill levels bringing about goal acceptance and commit- high enough to prevent discouragement, ment in this study. If, for the hypothesis that improved performance example, these people were allowed to par- resulted solely from competition, because no ticipate in goal setting, the goals might be special prizes or formal recognition pro- too difficult or they might be too easy.
On grams were provided for those who came the other hand, participation for the closest to, or exceeded, the goal. No effort educated worker was considered critical in was made by the company to single out one effecting maximum goal acceptance.
What if high performance the logic were wrong? Can we afford to im- In the assigned-goal group, super- plement these decisions without evaluating visors were highly supportive of employees. Would we implement No criticism was given for failure to attain decisions regarding a new approach to tree the goals. Instead, the supervisor lowered planting without first testing it? Do we care the goal after failure so that the employee more about trees than we do about people? The goal was Finally, permission was granted to conduct then raised gradually each week until the an experiment.
The result? Feelings of pointed to either participative goal setting, accomplishment and achievement on the assigned nonparticipative goal setting, or a part of the worker and improved productivi- do-your-best condition.
The results were ty for the company. The uneducated crews, consisting These basic findings were repli- primarily of black employees who par- cated in a subsequent study of engineers and ticipated in goal setting, set significantly scientists. Participative goal setting was higher goals and attained them more often superior to assigned goal setting only to the than did those whose goals were assigned by degree that it led to the setting of higher the supervisor. Not surprisingly, their per- goals.
Both participative and assigned-goal formance was higher. The performance of ducted to validate the conclusion that par- white, educationally advantaged workers ticipation in goal setting may be important was higher with assigned rather than par- only to the extent that it leads to the setting ticipatively set goals, although the difference of difficult goals.
It was performed in a was not statistically significant. These results laboratory setting in which the task was to were precisely the opposite of what had been brainstorm uses for wood. One group was predicted. A second group took part pative and assigned goals was conducted in deciding, with the experimenter, the with typists.
The results supported findings specific number of ideas each person would obtained by researchers at General Electric generate. These goals were, in turn, assigned years before. It did not matter so much how to individuals in a third group. In this way, the goal was set. What mattered was that a goal difficulty was held constant between the goal was set. The study demonstrated that assigned-goal and participative groups. The process by which these gains oc- ticipation-led to higher performance than curred, however, differed in the two groups.
Nevertheless, their assigned as compared with participatively 74 productivity improved-an outcome consis- set goals. Different experimental groups were combined where appropriate. If a control group was available, the percentage figure represents the difference of the percentage changes between the experimental and control groups.
If multiple performance measures were used, the median improvement on all measures was used. Note that goal setting has been setting in industry works just as it does in the successful across a wide variety of jobs and laboratory. Specific, challenging goals lead industries. Core Findings McClelland, a nonbehaviorist, argued for the exis- tence of internal motives, such as need for achievement, but The first issue we addressed was the relationship of goal these were asserted to be subconscious McClelland, At- difficulty to performance.
Behaviorists, drive reductionists, and probability of task success, was related to performance in a advocates of subconscious motives all agreed that intro- curvilinear, inverse function. The highest level of effort spection was not a valid method of understanding human occurred when the task was moderately difficult, and the motivation. This ruled out the possibility of studying the lowest levels occurred when the task was either very easy conscious regulation of action.
Atkinson did not measure personal perfor- An exception to the anticonsciousness zeitgeist was mance goals or goal difficulty. Moreover, his task-difficulty the work of Ryan.
Denise C. Park served as action editor for this article. Locke, R. Smith School of Business, Uni- action. Latham, Joseph L. Rotman School of Lewin and his colleagues e. This article is based in part on Edwin A. However, they tion in and of the Southeastern Psychological Association in Mace , a British investigator Psychological Association in and on his invited address to the American Psychological Society in His work was E-mail: elocke rhsmith.
Other factors being equal, expectancy is said to be linearly and positively related to performance. However, because difficult goals are harder to attain than easy goals, expectancy of goal success would presumably be negatively related to performance.
The apparent contradiction between the two theories is resolved by distinguishing expectancy within versus ex- pectancy between goal conditions.
Locke, Motowidlo, and Bobko found that when goal level is held constant, which is implicitly assumed by valence—instrumentality— expectancy theory, higher expectancies lead to higher lev- els of performance. Across goal levels, lower expectancies, This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This within— between distinction is not an issue in social— cognitive theory Bandura, , Self- efficacy task-specific confidence is measured by getting Edwin A.
The concept of self-efficacy is important in goal-setting theory in several ways. When goals are self- set, people with high self-efficacy set higher goals than do goals were measured.
They also are more com- in that the highest or most difficult goals produced the mitted to assigned goals, find and use better task strategies highest levels of effort and performance. Goal difficulty to attain the goals, and respond more positively to negative effect sizes d in meta-analyses ranged from. Latham, These issues creased only when the limits of ability were reached or are addressed further below.
Goal Mechanisms We also compared the effect of specific, difficult goals to a commonly used exhortation in organizational settings, Goals affect performance through four mechanisms.
We found that specific, difficult goals serve a directive function; they direct attention and goals consistently led to higher performance than urging effort toward goal-relevant activities and away from goal- people to do their best.
The effect sizes in meta-analyses irrelevant activities. This effect occurs both cognitively and ranged from. In short, behaviorally. For example, Rothkopf and Billington when people are asked to do their best, they do not do so.
This allows for a goal-irrelevant passages. Locke and Bryan observed wide range of acceptable performance levels, which is not that people who were given feedback about multiple as- the case when a goal level is specified. Goal specificity in pects of their performance on an automobile-driving task itself does not necessarily lead to high performance be- improved their performance on the dimensions for which cause specific goals vary in difficulty.
However, insofar as they had goals but not on other dimensions. High goals duce variation in performance by reducing the ambiguity lead to greater effort than low goals. Expectancy and Social—Cognitive 1 Task and goal difficulty are not synonymous and can be measured Theories separately. An example of a difficult task would be solving a complex anagram or a student pilot landing a plane.
The term performance goal, as we use it, refers to the score one attains on the task e. A learning goal refers to the number of ideas or that the force to act is a multiplicative combination of strategies one acquires or develops to accomplish the task effectively. There may be a time lag between assignment of the goal and the effects of the goal on performance, as people search for appropriate strategies Smith et al. This is because a performance goal can make people so This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This can create evaluative pressure and performance anx- iety. The antidote is to set specific challenging learning goals, such as to discover a certain number of different Gary P.
Perry, However, if the strategy used by the person is Third, goals affect persistence. For a however, a trade-off in work between time and intensity of detailed discussion of the relation of task goals and knowl- effort.
Faced with a difficult goal, it is possible to work edge, see Locke It is a virtual axiom found goal commitment questionnaires to have high reli- that all action is the result of cognition and motivation, but ability and validity. Commitment is most important and these elements can interact in complex ways. This is because goals that are difficult 1. If the path to the goal is not a matter of using Importance.
There are many ways to convince automatized skills, people draw from a repertoire of skills people that goal attainment is important. Making a public that they have used previously in related contexts, and they commitment to the goal enhances commitment, presum- apply them to the present situation.
Goal commitment can also be made modifications to their trucks so that they could better enhanced by leaders communicating an inspiring vision estimate truck weight before driving to the weighing and behaving supportively.
In field settings e. As noted, self-efficacy enhances thority to assign goals creates demand characteristics. Leaders can raise the self-efficacy of An alternative to assigning goals is to allow subordi- their subordinates a by ensuring adequate training to nates to participate in setting them.
The theory is that this increase mastery that provides success experiences, b by would make goals more important to the person because role modeling or finding models with whom the person can one would, at least in part, own the goals. The latter may participatively set versus assigned goals do not differ sig- involve giving subordinates information about strategies nificantly e. Erez and her colleagues Erez, ; Erez, to and cognitive stimulation of subordinates Bass, Working collaboratively, with Locke as mediator, For goals to be effective, people need summary feedback This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Latham and Erez explored reasons for their contradictory that reveals progress in relation to their goals. If they do not This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. They found that from a motivational perspective, know how they are doing, it is difficult or impossible for an assigned goal is as effective as one that is set participa- them to adjust the level or direction of their effort or to tively provided that the purpose or rationale for the goal is adjust their performance strategies to match what the goal given.
However, if the goal is assigned tersely e. If the goal is to cut down 30 trees in a day, people this. Summary for those studies that measured performance objectively, feedback is a moderator of goal effects in that the combi- yielded an effect size of only.
The assumptions that underlie control theory, stimulates information exchange. In essence, the theory is based on a ma- participation in goal setting had no beneficial effect on chine model derived from cybernetic engineering Powers, performance.
However, people who participated with oth- The source of motivation is asserted to be a negative ers in formulating task strategies performed significantly feedback loop such as that characterizing a thermostat better and had higher self-efficacy than those who did not that eliminates goal—performance discrepancies. The natu- participate in formulating strategies. However, there Control theory is in effect a mechanistic version of are important contingency factors.
However, machines do not possess internal Second, goals and incentive type interact. When the goal is motivational states and do not have goals of their own. Further- i. Once more, discrepancy reduction is a consequence rather than a people see that they are not getting the reward, their per- cause of goal-directed behavior. As Bandura stated, sonal goal and their self-efficacy drop and, consequently, goal setting is first and foremost a discrepancy-creating so does their performance.
This drop does not occur if the process. Motivation requires feed-forward control in addi- goal is moderately difficult or if people are given a difficult tion to feedback.
After people attain the goal they have goal and are paid for performance e. This adoption of higher goals creates rather than Yukl, ; T. In a study where the goal was to reduce theft, when self-efficacy regarding honest behavior was high, Task Complexity actions taken to change outcome expectancies led to a A third moderator of goal effects is task complexity. As the significant decrease in stolen material Latham, Because people vary greatly in their ability to do this, Observe that assigning a challenging goal alone raises the effect size for goal setting is smaller on complex than self-efficacy because this is an implicit expression of con- on simple tasks.
Lee et versus. However, not all incentive studies have found a Because people use a greater variety of strategies on mediating effect. Wood, Atkins, and Bright showed tasks that are complex than on tasks that are easy, measures that incentive effects were mediated by instrumentality or of task strategy often correlate more highly with perfor- outcome expectancies rather than by goals and efficacy. In addition, there are often goal—strategy goals, the feedback effects are mediated by the goals that This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. Bandura and Cervone found that both goals and R. Kanfer and Ackerman found that in an air self-efficacy mediated feedback effects. However, Winters and Latham showed that the As noted earlier, the benefits of participation in deci- fault was with the type of goal that had been set rather than sion making are primarily cognitive rather than motiva- with the theory.
They found that when a specific difficult tional. However, Latham and Yukl and Latham, learning goal rather than a performance goal was set, Mitchell, and Dossett found that employees who consistent with goal-setting theory, high goals led to sig- were allowed to participate in setting goals set higher goals nificantly higher performance on a complex task than did and had higher performance than those who were assigned the general goal of urging people do their best.
The higher the goals, the higher the Another factor that may facilitate performance on performance. Finally, Kirkpatrick and Locke found new, complex tasks is the use of proximal goals. Latham that goals and self-efficacy mediated the effect of visionary and Seijts , using a business game, found that do- leadership on employee performance. To say that one is condition where only a distal outcome goal had been set.
In trying to attain a goal of X means that one will not be dynamic situations, it is important to actively search for satisfied unless one attains X. For any on a dynamic task are often due to deficient decomposition given trial, exceeding the goal provides increasing satisfac- of a distal goal into proximal goals. Proximal goals can tion as the positive discrepancy grows, and not reaching the increase what Frese and Zapf called error manage- goal creates increasing dissatisfaction as the negative dis- ment.
Proximal feedback regarding errors can yield infor- mation for people about whether their picture of reality is aligned with what is required to attain their goal.
These variables are often, though not invariably, the most immediate, con- scious motivational determinants of action. As such, they can mediate the effects of external incentives. Locke and G. Reprinted with permission. The relation-. How can people who a scholarship; future benefits, such as an excellent job offer produce the most, those with difficult goals, be the least or a high starting salary; and life benefits, such as career satisfied?
The answer is implicit in the question. People with success. At the same time, expected satisfaction with per- high goals produce more because they are dissatisfied with formance showed the opposite pattern. The highest degree less. The bar for their satisfaction is set at a high level. This is of anticipated satisfaction, averaged across all grade out- why they are motivated to do more than those with easy goals.
The relation- People can expect many psychological and practical out- ships found by Mento et al. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Mento, E. Locke, and H. Klein, , Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, p. Copyright by the American Psychological Association. As allowable weight see Figure 3 as a result of assigned was the case with the engineers and scientists, the higher goals. A subsequent study appraisal.
Word-processing Latham, Saari, Pursell, and Campion developed the This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. In a survey of based on a job analysis. Meta-analyses have shown that the situational interview. Latham and J. Baldes, , Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, p. McDaniel, Whetzel, cle explains how high goals lead to high performance, Schmidt, and Maurer concluded that the mean cri- which in turn leads to rewards, such as recognition and terion-related validity of the situational interview is higher promotion.
Rewards result in high satisfaction as well as than that of all other selection interviews. This Self-Regulation at Work cycle explains the lack of a direct connection between job A key variable in self-regulation is goal setting. Job atten- satisfaction and subsequent productivity, an issue that has dance is a prerequisite of job performance.
Consequently, long puzzled psychologists e. In the high-performance cycle, high sat- methodology for the development of a training pro- isfaction is the result, not the cause, of high performance gram to teach unionized state government employees ways when rewards are commensurate with performance.
The to overcome obstacles they perceived to coming to work. Job satisfaction leads to perfor- set specific high goals for attendance, to monitor ways in mance only if it fosters organizational commitment, only if This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Goal setting also has been applied make progress toward goal attainment.
It is these employees to cope effectively with personal and applicable to any self-regulated activity. Increases in self-efficacy correlated significantly with subsequent increases in job attendance.
Goal conflict undermines performance if it attendance were maintained over a nine-month period. Seijts and Latham b found ing in self-regulation skills as the original experimental that when specific, difficult goals of the person are aligned group. Without such alignment, level as that of the original experimental group. Those students who set specific high goals regarding their evaluation by peers and who received We noted earlier that on tasks that are complex for people, training in verbal self-guidance regarding goal attainment learning goals can be superior to performance goals.
How- had higher team-playing skills than those who did not set ever, there have been almost no studies examining the use goals. Intriguing findings have been obtained by Mental practice is symbolic guided rehearsal of a task Harackiewicz, Barron, Carter, Lehto, and Elliott in the absence of any physical involvement Richardson, with college students. Performance goals improved grades Six months rious effect on a wide range of educationally relevant later, self-efficacy was significantly higher for the supervi- outcome measures.
Self-efficacy correlated significantly with goal commitment and commu- Organizations must take risks to remain competitive in the nication skills on the job. Latham conducted a study to performance goals increased the riskiness of the strategies determine whether a learning goal too is a strong variable. Obviously, higher risk strategies sometimes given a specific, difficult learning goal perform as well as lead to worse performance outcomes than lower risk ones, those with a learning goal who have an LGO.
In short, and the conditions under which better or worse outcomes assigned goals neutralize goal orientation effects. Further evidence that the setting of a high goal creates a strong situation was obtained by Harackiewicz and Elliott Personality Using a pinball machine, they found that, regard- Two related issues are involved here.
First, do goals, along less of whether a person scored high or low on need for with self-efficacy, mediate personality effects? It must achievement as measured by a self-report questionnaire , a be noted here that there is some doubt about the meaning specific high-performance goal that was accompanied by a of personality test scores Bandura, , If a rationale or purpose that emphasized a PGO resulted in a trait measure refers only to past behavior, then trait— higher level of intrinsic motivation e.
Traits, in this case, would predict emphasized an LGO. In the absence of a statement of This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
If, however, traits are viewed, purpose, a specific high-performance goal that emphasized explicitly or implicitly, as reflecting, in some form, under- an LGO resulted in the highest level of intrinsic interest in lying motives, then they would constitute an explanation. For example, Because we had studied conscious goals and McClelland et Matsui, Okada, and Kakuyama found that the rela- al. Barrick, concepts. The results, involving entrepreneurs in the print- Mount, and Strauss found that the effects of con- ing business, showed that need for achievement, measured scientiousness on sales performance were partially medi- by the Thematic Apperception Test TAT; a projective ated by goals and goal commitment.
However, goal effects were highly significant in both performance. The second issue involved is whether goals are better Howard and Bray collected TAT data in a predictors of action than traits. Collaborating with effects, then the former should predict better than the latter. This score combined need for literature, argued that a performance goal is a strong vari- power, power inhibition, and need for affiliation weighted able that masks personality differences.
Yukl and Latham negatively. Howard also possessed unscored TAT proto- found that goals predicted performance and satis- cols that she subsequently added to the data set. In addition, faction better than a measure of need for achievement. In the reanalysis, the ality traits characterized children in the classroom. As noted, the latter study found LGO effects e.
Second, the conscious and subconscious to be fully mediated by goals. People can take action without being fully the role of goals as mediators of other incentives; and the aware of what is motivating them or what stored knowl- effect of goal source e. The lack of focus on the patively set. In the Goal-setting theory is not limited to but focuses pri- 19th century, the Wurzburg school Ach, Watt, Kulpe, and marily on motivation in work settings. Social— cognitive others —a school that influenced Lewin—showed that as- theory and the research that underlies it are primarily signed goals they used the term tasks could affect action focused on self-efficacy, its measurement, its causes, and at a later time without people being aware of it.
Research is its consequences at the individual, group, and societal now needed on the effect of the subconscious on goals and levels in numerous domains of functioning. Social— cogni- on the ways in which goals arouse and affect subconscious tive theory also discusses the effects of and processes knowledge.
As an initial step in this direction, Wegge and underlying modeling, cognitive development, moral judg- Dibbelt found that hard goals automatically en- ment, language development, and physiological arousal. Despite these differences, the two theories agree about This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
Goal-setting theory states that, irrespective of the sub- what is considered important in performance motivation. A conscious, conscious motivation affects performance and detailed discussion of the relationship of goal theory to job satisfaction. This is especially true for people who other work motivation theories is presented in Locke choose to be purposeful and proactive Binswanger, As Bandura noted, people have the power to ac- The effects of goal setting are very reliable.
Goal-setting theory is fully consistent with generalization.
0コメント